|
# of starters |
1st Place Scores |
|
< 21 |
150 |
|
21-30 |
180 |
|
31-40 |
195 |
| 41-50 | 210 |
| 51-60 | 225 |
The ranking score for each participant utilizes the following formula in which
TP = Total points for the event based on the number of participants in the event
S = # of starters
F = Finishing position in the regatta
Finishing positions in the 3 applicable regattas, i.e. most firsts, most seconds, on down.
Number of regattas competed in.
Coin toss by Class secretary.
Prior to reading the FAQ it is assumed you have read through the Rules
Balance without compromising the following:
Determine the top IOM USA sailors, presently active in the Fleet, so when entries are limited the ranking system will be used to allocate slots
Encourage travelling outwith the home region while recognizing the constrains for some individuals
Reward & recognize those that are RD's
Recognise & encourage local regattas
If we are to allow participants sufficient time to plan and get organised for a major event, then we should confirm their slot 6 months ahead of the first day of the competition
The ranking time period is 12 months, therefore races up to 18month prior to the event could be included.
For the 2009 World championships we are potentially within the ranking window
last year only 3 individuals travelled to four or more ranking events
12 people participated in 3 events
Therefore 3 was seen as being able to attract a reasonable population while allowing those that needed or wanted to attend more could still do so. The belief is that now 3 regattas is a more achievable target the participation will increase
There were two elements here that had to be addressed, the regatta score and the distribution of points within the fleet.
Regatta Points
In the previous system there was a “weighting” applied to the regatta.
This consisted of the number of base points, 100, 125, 150, 175 or 200 points depending on the perceived difficulty in winning the regatta
Then the number of entrants was added to give a total # of points for first place.
The issue here was that the point allocation had to be determined, was perceived as subjective and open to debate
In the revised system the total number of points is driven by the # of entrants as this is believed to be the primary driver for difficulty in winning the event. As per the chart below
|
# of starters |
1st Place Scores |
| < 21 |
150 |
| 21-30 |
180 |
| 31-40 |
195 |
| 41-50 | 210 |
| 51-60 | 225 |
Basically starting from a base of 150 points,
once the # of entries reaches 21-30 starters the available regatta points
are multiplied by 1.2
once the # of entries reaches 31-40 Starters the available regatta points are multiplied by 1.3, etc.
20 Boats and below the base of 150 points is used.
Point Distribution
Here the present system is utilized, basically dividing the total available points by the # of starters.
Below is an example showing scoring across different fleet sizes
|
Base Points |
150 |
|
150 |
|
150 |
|
150 |
| # of boats | 36 |
|
29 |
|
15 |
|
45 |
| Multiplier | 1.3 |
|
1.2 |
|
1 |
|
1.4 |
| Total points for 1st place | 195 |
|
180 |
|
150 |
|
210 |
| 4th place scored | 179 |
|
161 |
|
120 |
|
196 |
| 10th | 146 |
|
124 |
|
60 |
|
168 |
| 15th | 119 |
|
93 |
|
10 |
|
145 |
For the 2008 Europeans the present 2007 system will be utilized
For events in 2009 the revised system will be utilsed and will pull in the events from 2007 as required, these will be scored retreospectivally per this system
Florida followed by Dallas
Revised results will be posted on the NCA website within 20 days of a ranking event